05-13-2010, 01:28 PM
Seems what the article failed to mention was that the "surpass" was only from 150000 people surveyed. It has nothing to do with actual usage or sales statistics. It was also only on purchases made in the first quarter of 2010. Simply put, there are more iPhones than Androids after all. All it said was that the really small survey sample preferred the Android by a pretty small margin. They preferred it during that lowest sales time for iPhones (right before announcement of the new models) and while VZ was giving a 2 for 1.
Yeah, useless figures after all. This argument is now defunct.
Yeah, useless figures after all. This argument is now defunct.
Rizxen - Master of Clones