July 20th 1969 Moon landing

[Thudz]

So what makes more sense?

That we built, engineered, trained, spent billions, killed many learning to do so (including Russians) in order to figure out how to send man to the moon then we followed through with that science and proceeded to send man to the moon.

Or

That we built, engineered, trained, spent billions, killed many to figure out how to send man to the moon but instead sent 6 un-maned lunar landers to the moon. Then we proceeded to spend more money, resourses and engineering it to make it look like we did not only once but 6 times?




Do you have any idea how many people it would take to pull off a lie like that and still make the science work? That includes somehow getting the Russians to partake in our little lie. Please think about that for a moment. Some how we got our greatest single historical enemy to go along with this prank which was a direct insult to them?

It would be harder and more expensive to engineer the lie then it would be to put men on the moon. In-fact I am not even sure we have the technology today to pull off that lie.



Vllad

I'm not trying to rationalize a conspiracy. I'm trying to prove to myself that the events actually took place as they are being presented. I was not alive then, I'm not a first hand witness to the event or the period of time leading up to and after the event. All I have are reports, pictures and video and alot of people telling me I'm crazy for even being skeptical. Unlike, what I would call a hoaxer, I'm not trying to disprove it, I'm trying to to prove it, to myself.

I'm waiting for the high resolution low orbit pictures of the landing sites, much like what we did on Mars, which were great pictures BTW.